Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Greg Nooney, LCSW

 I first heard Greg Nooney when I took his PESI class in Feb 2024 "Dissociative Identity Disorder, Diagnosis, Stabilization and Complex Trauma Treatment in Clients with DID"

And I heard Greg Nooney speak at the Infinite Mind Healing Together conference in Feb? 2024. Collaborative Healing: Best Practices in Working with Clients with Dissociative Systems September 8, 2024, Gregory L. Nooney, MSW, ACSW, LISW (IA), LCSW (HI)



Download Handout

Nooney suggests 3 Pillars of treatment:

First Pillar
Here are Nooney's 3 Domains of treatment modalities:


This is Nooney's developmental model. 
Second Pillar:
Inner World
Third Pillar:
The Three C's


Greg Nooney explicitly talks about the “Three Cs” when conceptualizing dissociative systems:

👉 Communication
👉 Cooperation
👉 Co-consciousness

He uses these as clinical dimensions to understand how organized or integrated a system is, especially in Phase 1 stabilization work.

Below is a synthesis of his model (from his books, trainings, and DID clinical literature), plus how clinicians often operationalize it.


🧠 Nooney’s “Three Cs” — How systems are described

Nooney emphasizes that treatment involves helping clients develop internal communication, cooperation, and co-consciousness as part of stabilization and healing. (NASW Press)

Think of these as axes — not categories. Systems can be high in one and low in another.


1️⃣ Communication — “Can parts talk or share information?”

Definition:
The degree to which alters can exchange information internally.

Low communication

  • Amnesia barriers

  • Parts unaware of each other

  • “Lost time”

  • Sudden switches with confusion

  • Internal silence

Moderate

  • Occasional internal dialogue

  • Journaling between parts

  • Therapist-mediated communication

  • Dreams or symbolic messages

High

  • Ongoing internal conversation

  • Shared memory channels

  • Internal meetings

  • Negotiation around decisions

Clinical goal: Reduce secrecy and isolation.


2️⃣ Cooperation — “Do parts work toward shared safety?”

Definition:
How willing parts are to collaborate rather than sabotage.

Low cooperation

  • Internal conflict or “wars”

  • Self-harm or risky behaviors by some parts

  • Hostile protectors

  • Competing agendas

Moderate

  • Conditional agreements

  • Parts tolerate each other

  • Therapist helps negotiate

High

  • Shared goals

  • Mutual respect

  • System agreements

  • Protective coordination

Clinical goal: Build internal trust and reduce polarization.


3️⃣ Co-consciousness — “Who is aware when someone else is out?”

Definition:
Simultaneous awareness across parts.

Low co-consciousness

  • Full switching with blackout

  • “Coming to” in new places

  • Memory gaps

Moderate

  • Watching from inside

  • Partial awareness

  • Emotional bleed-through

High

  • Shared observing self

  • Continuous awareness

  • Blended or dual awareness

Clinical goal: Increase continuity of experience.


🪶 How clinicians often describe systems using these dimensions

You might hear formulations like:

  • “Low communication, low cooperation, low co-consciousness” → highly dissociated

  • “Good communication but low cooperation” → negotiating system

  • “High co-consciousness but conflict” → aware but polarized

  • “High across all three” → functional multiplicity or nearing integration

This is much more nuanced than just “integrated vs fragmented.”


🧩 Why Nooney emphasizes this

His stance (very consistent with ISSTD guidelines) is:

👉 Multiplicity is adaptive
👉 Forcing fusion is not the goal
👉 Increasing the Three Cs increases safety

He specifically warns about not breaking dissociative barriers too quickly, because destabilization risk rises if cooperation isn’t there yet. (NASW Press)



🛠 Clinical markers you might listen for in session

Since you work with DID clients, you probably already do this — but here are typical indicators:

Communication clues

  • “We talked about this”

  • Internal voices

  • Journaling between parts

Cooperation clues

  • Agreements about safety

  • Negotiating triggers

  • Protectors softening

Co-consciousness clues

  • “I was watching”

  • Blending language

  • Shared recall


🌿 A subtle point Nooney often makes

He emphasizes:

Systems can function well without full fusion.

Which aligns with modern DID thinking — stabilization and collaboration matter more than structural outcome.

 

Post a Comment

0 Comments