I first heard Greg Nooney when I took his PESI class in Feb 2024 "Dissociative Identity Disorder, Diagnosis, Stabilization and Complex Trauma Treatment in Clients with DID"
And I heard Greg Nooney speak at the Infinite Mind Healing Together conference in Feb? 2024. Collaborative Healing: Best Practices in Working with Clients with Dissociative Systems September 8, 2024, Gregory L. Nooney, MSW, ACSW, LISW (IA), LCSW (HI)
Greg Nooney explicitly talks about the “Three Cs” when conceptualizing dissociative systems:
👉 Communication
👉 Cooperation
👉 Co-consciousness
He uses these as clinical dimensions to understand how organized or integrated a system is, especially in Phase 1 stabilization work.
Below is a synthesis of his model (from his books, trainings, and DID clinical literature), plus how clinicians often operationalize it.
🧠Nooney’s “Three Cs” — How systems are described
Nooney emphasizes that treatment involves helping clients develop internal communication, cooperation, and co-consciousness as part of stabilization and healing. (NASW Press)
Think of these as axes — not categories. Systems can be high in one and low in another.
1️⃣ Communication — “Can parts talk or share information?”
Definition:
The degree to which alters can exchange information internally.
Low communication
Amnesia barriers
Parts unaware of each other
“Lost time”
Sudden switches with confusion
Internal silence
Moderate
Occasional internal dialogue
Journaling between parts
Therapist-mediated communication
Dreams or symbolic messages
High
Ongoing internal conversation
Shared memory channels
Internal meetings
Negotiation around decisions
Clinical goal: Reduce secrecy and isolation.
2️⃣ Cooperation — “Do parts work toward shared safety?”
Definition:
How willing parts are to collaborate rather than sabotage.
Low cooperation
Internal conflict or “wars”
Self-harm or risky behaviors by some parts
Hostile protectors
Competing agendas
Moderate
Conditional agreements
Parts tolerate each other
Therapist helps negotiate
High
Shared goals
Mutual respect
System agreements
Protective coordination
Clinical goal: Build internal trust and reduce polarization.
3️⃣ Co-consciousness — “Who is aware when someone else is out?”
Definition:
Simultaneous awareness across parts.
Low co-consciousness
Full switching with blackout
“Coming to” in new places
Memory gaps
Moderate
Watching from inside
Partial awareness
Emotional bleed-through
High
Shared observing self
Continuous awareness
Blended or dual awareness
Clinical goal: Increase continuity of experience.
🪶 How clinicians often describe systems using these dimensions
You might hear formulations like:
“Low communication, low cooperation, low co-consciousness” → highly dissociated
“Good communication but low cooperation” → negotiating system
“High co-consciousness but conflict” → aware but polarized
“High across all three” → functional multiplicity or nearing integration
This is much more nuanced than just “integrated vs fragmented.”
🧩 Why Nooney emphasizes this
His stance (very consistent with ISSTD guidelines) is:
👉 Multiplicity is adaptive
👉 Forcing fusion is not the goal
👉 Increasing the Three Cs increases safety
He specifically warns about not breaking dissociative barriers too quickly, because destabilization risk rises if cooperation isn’t there yet. (NASW Press)
🛠Clinical markers you might listen for in session
Since you work with DID clients, you probably already do this — but here are typical indicators:
Communication clues
“We talked about this”
Internal voices
Journaling between parts
Cooperation clues
Agreements about safety
Negotiating triggers
Protectors softening
Co-consciousness clues
“I was watching”
Blending language
Shared recall
🌿 A subtle point Nooney often makes
He emphasizes:
Systems can function well without full fusion.
Which aligns with modern DID thinking — stabilization and collaboration matter more than structural outcome.










.png)
0 Comments
Thank you for commenting! Jane